Article "Bafo da Onça" in Portuguese Wikipedia has 14.6 points for quality (as of November 1, 2023). The article contains 2 references and 0 sections.
Since the creation of article "Bafo da Onça", its content was written by 10 registered users of Portuguese Wikipedia and edited by 10 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 173 times in Portuguese Wikipedia and cited 173 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from November 1, 2023 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Portuguese: #20365 02.2012 |
Global: #552903 02.2012 |
| Best Rank | Portuguese: #5994 06.2017 |
Global: #474695 06.2017 |
On 25 June 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: UEFA Euro 2024, Julian Assange, UEFA European Championship, UEFA Euro 2020, Shifty Shellshock, 2024 Copa América, WikiLeaks, YouTube, Inside Out 2, House of the Dragon.
In Portuguese Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Sávio Moreira de Oliveira, Julian Assange, Copa América, Campeonato Europeu de Futebol de 2024, Campeonato Europeu de Futebol, ChatGPT, SoFi Stadium, Copa América de 2024, Joel Campbell, Costa Rica.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from November, 2023. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from October 2023 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(2.14+1.31+9.09+0+60.52)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
